EDWN 601 Assessment and Modifications of Instruction
Saint Mary’s University of Minnesota
Schools of Graduate and Professional Programs
Norda Program
Spring 2012
3 credits
Blended Course
Course Meetings: Course meets twice during semester. Each meeting is Friday 6-9; Saturday 9-4
Prerequisite: Admission to Norda Alternative Licensure Program
Instructor: Margaret Foss, Ph.D.
Available by phone, M-Th 9-4: 715-532-608; by email 24 hours.
Course Description
This is one of two courses in the teacher certification process for participants in Project Teaching, an alternative certification program approved by the Wisconsin Department of Public Instruction. Participants learn about the conceptual framework for teacher licensure in Wisconsin and are guided in their development toward “proficient performance in the knowledge, skills, and dispositions in each of the 10 Wisconsin Teacher Standards” required for licensure. This course emphasizes assessment and modification of instruction.
Student Learning Objectives
On completion of the course students are expected to be able to do the following.
- understand how children with broad ranges of ability learn and provide 20 hours of pre-practicum instruction that demonstrates their ability to support the intellectual, social, and personal development of pupils (Standard 2);
- understand how pupils differ in their approaches to learning and the barriers that impede learning and adapt lesson plans to that it meets the diverse needs of pupils, including those with disabilities and exceptionalities (Standard 3);
- understand and demonstrate in their curriculum units the use of a variety of instructional strategies, including the use of technology, to encourage children’s development of critical thinking, problem solving, forecasting and performance skills (Standard 4);
- organize and plan a curriculum unit that demonstrates systematic instruction based upon knowledge of subject matter, pupils, the community, and stated curriculum goals (Standard 7);
- understand and demonstrate through the development of a curriculum unit the use of formal and informal assessment strategies to evaluate and ensure the continuous intellectual, social, and physical development of the pupil (Standard 8);
- reflect on practice and demonstrate in a pre-practicum journal the ability to continually evaluate the effect of their choices and actions on pupils, parents, professional in the learning community and others and to actively seek out opportunities to grow professionally (Standard 9);
- foster relationships and demonstrate in a pre-practicum journal the ability to connect with school colleagues, parents, and agencies in the larger community to support pupil learning and well-being and to act with integrity, fairness and in an ethical manner (Standard 10).
These course objectives are aligned with the Wisconsin Teacher Standards and are numbered accordingly.
Textbooks
Texts are handed out during the first class meeting.
Texts also include websites listed on the Project Teaching home page
Various supplemental material will be handed out.
- Curtin, E.M. (2009). Pathways to Teaching Series: Practical Strategies for Teaching English Language Learners. Upper Saddle River, New Jersey: Merrill.
- Lemov, D. (2010). Teach LIke a Champion. San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.
Online resources are listed with reading assignments.
Topical Course Outline
Session |
Class meeting |
Topics |
Reading Assignments |
Written Assignments |
Prior to Session 1 |
|
Assessment |
http://www.s-tests.com/glossary/ Minority Relations:
http://www.kstrom.net/isk/maps/wi/wisconsin.html
http://books.google.com/books?id=1VOGlufZHlMC&pg=PA11&source=gbs_toc_r&cad=0_0 |
Minority Relations Paper |
Session |
Class meeting |
Topics |
Reading Assignments |
Written Assignments |
Session 1 |
Friday evening, Saturday |
Program Orientation & Logistics
Reflective Practice |
[following session 1, review materials in Curtin chapter 8]
|
|
Prior to Session 2 |
|
Curriculum planning |
Curtin chapters 1-3 |
Semester plan Sample assessment |
Session 2 |
Friday evening, Saturday |
Modifications used in Education
|
The following will be helpful: |
|
After Session 2 |
|
|
|
Special Education Teacher Interview. General modifications for Special Education |
Written work details Assignments will be received and responded to primarily by email. If for some reason that doesn’t work, the U.S. mail service will be used. All written work should be submitted in APA style and should include supporting citations whenever appropriate. Feedback will be provided on all work. When work is completed and final edits made, all papers should be inserted into the Portfolio 1 in Efolio.com, using the “basic” template in order to cut and paste the papers directly into the online portfolio.
Minority Relations Papers
Background paper: Write a 3-5 page descriptive paper on your understanding of (standard 2) minority group relations including Native American history and one or two of the remaining general topics:
- History, culture, and tribal sovereignty of Native American tribes and bands located in Wisconsin
- History, culture, and contributions of women and various racial, cultural, language, and economic groups in the United States
- Philosophical and psychological basis of attitude development and change
- The psychological and social implications of discrimination, especially racism and sexism in American society
Characteristic |
Wow - 5 |
OK – 4 |
Oops - 3 |
Native American historical information |
An clear effort is made to describe the historical plight of at least one WI Tribe |
Brief mention of the history of several tribes occurs in the paper |
Native American history is discussed, but is quite general, not WI focused |
Prejudice and its implications |
These are discussed thoroughly as they affect Native Americans or other minorities in WI |
Prejudice is discussed in broad terms that do not relate to WI groups |
A brief statement about prejudice is made, but is not expanded in a meaningful way |
Writing quality |
The writing is clear and concise, using proper APA style for citations and references |
Writing is clear and concise, with some minor APA errors |
No effort is made to properly cite works in the paper. |
Experiences paper: Write a 2-3 page reflection on your personal experiences with minority group relations (standard 10), addressing both of these topics and using personal anecdotes where possible.
- Evaluating and assessing the forces of discrimination, especially racism and sexism on faculty, students, curriculum, instruction, and assessment in the school program
- Direct involvement with racial, cultural, language, and economic groups in the United States
Characteristic |
Wow - 5 |
OK – 4 |
Oops - 3 |
Discuss how discrimination affects schools |
Clearly discusses prejudice and its effect on students, faculty, instruction and assessment |
Discussion overemphasizes one or two of the 4 areas stated in ‘Wow’ |
Discrimination and prejudice are discussed in very general terms, |
Personal experience |
Thorough description of personal experience with a minority group or as a minority and lessons learned through the experience |
Personal experience is described, but lessons learned are not explicitly stated |
General experience of minority relations discussed, no personal example. |
Writing mechanics |
Few, minor errors |
Some errors |
Many errors |
Assessment Paper
Write a 3- to 5-page discussing ways to incorporate standardized assessment in planning instructional approach. Include the following in your discussion:
- Describe your impressions (positive and negative) about standardized testing. (no more than 1 pg)
- Select a school or school district of interest to you and obtain a copy of the school’s WKCE data http://www.dpi.state.wi.us./sig/index.html. Prepare an analysis of the WKCE data from either the 8th or 10th grade reports.
- Discuss the significance of the demographic data reported on the bottom of the WKCE report.
Characteristic |
Wow - 5 |
OK – 4 |
Oops – 3 |
Your impressions on Standardized assessment |
Discussion shows a clear understanding of standardized assessment and its use in education |
Comments indicate an unclear understanding of standardized assessment. |
Standardized assessment is used in ways that are inconsistent with its common definition |
WKCE interpretation |
A school’s WKCE scores are discussed thoroughly for all subjects in one year and some comparisons are drawn to at least one other year |
WKCE scores are discussed for only a few of the provided subjects or only for one year |
WKCE scores are discussed in ways that are inconsistent with the terms used for reporting |
Demographic data |
Demographics are thoroughly discussed for the reported school’s data, especially paying attention to how student performance varies in the subgroups for that school |
One particular demographic category is discussed in detail, the others are only mentioned briefly |
Demographic data is glossed over in generalities |
Writing mechanics |
Few, minor errors |
Some errors |
Many errors |
Curriculum unit components
Standard 7: Outline a semester plan for one class and indicate where this curriculum unit fits into the semester plan. Connect topics to the Wisconsin Model Academic Standards: http://dpi.wi.gov/standards/disciplinaryliteracy.html
Characteristic |
Wow - 5 |
OK – 4 |
Oops – 3 |
Long range plan fits student needs |
Plan is clearly written and logical in its progression |
Plan has some detail and logic, but is unclear in some minor way |
Plan is too general for actual use |
Plan supports WI standards |
Plan shows links to WI state standards, with standards numbers listed by topics |
Only most general topics have standards listed |
Plan is not linked to the WMAS in a consistent way. |
Writing mechanics |
Few, minor errors |
Some errors |
Many errors |
Standard 8: Formative and summative assessments including at least one performance assessment.
Characteristic |
Wow 5 |
OK – 4 |
Oops – 3 |
Rubric |
Rubric is well written, with clear differences between levels of performance |
Rubric is too general to be a learning tool for students |
Rubric does not assess primary components of the task |
Other assessment |
Directions and information is clear and focused on meaningful learning goals |
Some of the assessment is focused on trivial ideas, not important learning goals |
A significant portion of the assessment is focused on surface level learning like definitions |
Writing mechanics |
Few, minor errors |
Some errors |
Many errors |
Standard 3: Describe modifications you would make to daily lesson plans for students with special needs and English language learners.
- Describe how the RtI (Response to Intervention) model of instruction & intervention could be used.
- Describe how would you modify your daily lesson plans to incorporate co-teaching strategies?
- Choose a category or two from Special Education and describe several general ways to modify for persons with these needs. Describe general modifications for English Language Learners
Characteristic |
Wow 5 |
OK – 4 |
Oops – 3 |
Modifications for special needs including explicitly planned RtI and/or co-teaching. |
Good general descriptions of several modifications that could be made for struggling learners in activities and assessments. RtI and co-teaching strategies are included |
General descriptions of modifications that could be made for struggling learners in activities and assessments. |
only one type of modification is described, little flexibility of strategy use |
Modifications for English language learners for all learning activities |
Several modifications appropriate for ELL’s are included specifically |
Modifications for ELL’s seems to be the same thing over and over |
Nothing really provided to help ELL students achieve |
Writing mechanics |
Few, minor errors |
Some errors |
Many errors |
Special Education Teacher Interview
Standard 9: Interview a special education teacher and write a description of the interview and your response to the ideas, which should include the following.
- How can RtI be used to augment Special Educational services?
- Inquire about the IEP process and the regular education teachers’ responsibilities,
- Inquire about the roles and responsibilities of the special education teacher and regular education teacher,
- What are the best ways to foster the relationship between the special education teacher and the regular education teacher?
- How do co-teachers collaboratively modify instruction, assessment and standards so that all students can be successful?
- Describe how co-teaching relates to RtI (Response to Intervention).
Characteristic |
Wow - 5 |
OK – 4 |
Oops – 3 |
RtI |
The role of RtI is described, along with additional steps in referring a student for SpEd |
Either RtI or referral explanation is not fully described |
RtI steps are mentioned, but not explained enough to be usable |
Roles of Reg Ed and Sp Ed teachers |
The roles of both Reg and SpEd teachers are described, especially in terms of what each does to aid student learning |
Teachers’ roles in student learning are not fully elaborated |
Teacher roles are highly stereotypical or poorly described |
IEP |
Description of the IEP process is clear and detailed |
IEP process is a little confusing or unclear |
IEP is only briefly mentioned |
Co-teaching |
Detailed description of actual co-teaching or an idealized view of what co-teaching would look like, if the teacher hasn’t done this |
Co-teaching description is incomplete or unclear |
Idealized view is completely unrealistic and no actual co-teaching was discussed |
Writing mechanics |
Few, minor errors |
Some errors |
Many errors |
Grading Criteria
- Minority Relations Background 15 points
- Minority Relations Experiences 15 points
- Assessment Paper 20 points
- Curriculum Unit
- Semester Plan 15 points
- Assessment 15 points
- Special Education modifications 15 points
- Special Education Teacher Interview 25 points
Grading Scale
A |
90-100% |
B |
80-89% |
C |
70-79% |
NC |
below 70% |
Writing Center & Library Services
Saint Mary’s University’s Twin Cities Campus Library is available to help students access online and print resources, develop search strategies, find scholarly sources, evaluate information, and more. Please see the Library Web page. For further assistance, contact a librarian at the Twin Cities Campus Library at 612-728-5108 or toll-free at 866-437-2788, ext. 108.
Norda Policies for Successful Completion
Portfolio
Progress in our certification program is based on two portfolios:
- Portfolio 1 is comprised of class work (EDWN 600 & EDWN 601) and other experiences you have had. Portfolio 1 must be completed before student teaching.
- Portfolio 2 is based on student teaching experiences. Artifacts for Portfolio 2 come from the student teaching experience. Portfolio 2 must be completed before licensure is recommended.
- Additional work in Environmental Education is required of teachers seeking certification in agriculture, science and social studies.
- Additional work on Cooperatives is required of teachers for economics, social studies or agriculture certification.
Twenty (20) Hours Pre-Practicum Experience Requirement
(Standard 9)
Complete a practicum with the minimum of twenty (20) hours in a school of your choice. This can be accomplished in the following ways: by substitute teaching, “permit” teaching with a placement minimum of twenty (20) hours, or through classroom observation. This practicum must be monitored by an experienced teacher or a school administrator. Include observations/experience with the special needs student population in an inclusive classroom. (Practicum can be completed when enrolled in either EDWN 601 or EDWN 600. It must be completed prior to the student teaching placement.)
Write a daily or weekly reflective journal detailing your practicum experiences. Include descriptions of classroom/inclusion instructional activities, modifications/adaptations for exceptional students, events, student behavior management that you observe or participate in. Finally reflect on your experiences, by describing ways in which they have helped you understand and participate in teaching experiences.
To validate your practicum experiences, the mentor teacher or administrator must sign off on your experiences on the 20-Hours Documentation form.
Additional Assignments for Specific Certifications
Early Childhood Early/middle childhood practicum experience (Standard 3) This applies only to teachers to be licensed in birth to age 21 (agriculture, art, business, English as a second language, family & consumer education, music, health, physical education, technology, theatre, and world languages).
- Write a 2- to 4-page paper describing your experiences in an early/middle childhood practicum.
Cooperatives PI 34.15(4)(a) Cooperative marketing and consumer cooperatives. (Standard 4) This applies only to teachers to be licensed in agriculture, economics, or social studies.
- Read the web sites at http://norda.com/cooperatives.aspx and write a two-week instructional unit using age-appropriate concepts about cooperative marketing and consumer cooperatives. Unit should include: objectives, target age/grade level, 10 days of activities including an assessment.
- You must attend a Project Wild, WET or PLT workshop. We offer two, face-to-face workshops each year or you can attend one offered by other facilitators.
- Use the curriculum materials you receive at the work shop to design a two-week instructional unit to help students learn some of the major conceps of environmental education. Unit should include: objectives, target age/grade level, 10 days of activities including an assessment.
